UA-12921627-3

Jump to content


So what's happening Pingu?

I am currently doing some tinkering behind the scenes to add in some features I want in place before I do the reorganisation.

during this time you may notice your member group changes, weird buttons appear.. and then vanish and slices of toast suddenly materialise before being eaten by a low flying puppy...

all is well and will be working fully over the next week.

rescue wise I have some really nice stuff going in that I hope will be of use to you for both re-homing and fundraising.. provided it all works properly of course...

Photo

Lennox Case


  • Please log in to reply
20 replies to this topic

#1 purple_mog

purple_mog
  • Established Member
  • 1,942 posts

Posted 07 December 2010 - 12:51 PM

Looks like the Lennox case has been postponed again until Feb 2011 :mecry:

(more info here website)
  • hwnhocjf5, Elenaenrila, Bymmesgogkek and 1 other like this

#2 purple_mog

purple_mog
  • Established Member
  • 1,942 posts

Posted 07 December 2010 - 01:07 PM

CONFIRMED: Lennox hearing adjourned until 1st Feb 2011.

#3 BillyMalc

BillyMalc

    vegan heathen

  • Established Member
  • 6,963 posts

Posted 07 December 2010 - 09:45 PM

Can only come up with a helluvalot of swear words - but I'm so aware that nobody can possibly feel as angry, sad and frustrated as poor Lennox' family :( :( What a travesty this whole sad case is ... :angry: :angry:

#4 western star

western star
  • Established Member
  • 147 posts

Posted 30 September 2011 - 11:49 AM

Just read on another forum that Lennox has been ordered to be destroyed this morning so I can only guess that he's been killed by now :mecry:

I'm so angry n upset I can't type any more

RUN Free with the angels Lennox :mecry: :mecry: :wub:

#5 BillyMalc

BillyMalc

    vegan heathen

  • Established Member
  • 6,963 posts

Posted 30 September 2011 - 08:33 PM

The family have got one last chance: 2 weeks to find a legal loophole through which they can save Lennox :( http://www.bbc.co.uk...reland-15127533
Another website, set up for people who want to help: http://savelennoxlaw.wordpress.com/

Edited by BillyMalc, 30 September 2011 - 08:34 PM.


#6 blackmagic

blackmagic
  • Established Member
  • 3,148 posts

Posted 30 September 2011 - 10:14 PM

Apparently the warrant used referred to a different address

#7 EGAR

EGAR

    The Hairy One

  • Banned
  • 3,855 posts

Posted 05 October 2011 - 04:05 PM

Trust me, all is not as it seems, there is a lot more to this case than the owners want to you believe.

#8 Rumpole

Rumpole

    Drontal Chick

  • Hosts
  • 4,522 posts

Posted 07 October 2011 - 07:52 AM

we have a copy of the judgement there is no legal loophole the order was made based on the evidence of both prosecution and defence and the judge decided as is his right on the evidence that he was not satisfied that there was no risk to public safety based on what the defence themselves said as well as the prosecution. It was up to the defence to satisfy the judge due to the burden of proof being reversed and he found that in the main their evidence supported the opinions of the prosecution rather than dispelled them.

The law doesnt give any leeway if the judge is not satisfied and states that if this is the case they must pts.

Terribly sad situation but not one i see changing due to any legal loophole.

#9 EGAR

EGAR

    The Hairy One

  • Banned
  • 3,855 posts

Posted 07 October 2011 - 01:18 PM

http://smg.photobuck...rent=lennox.mp4

#10 Lizzie

Lizzie
  • Established Member
  • 1,038 posts

Posted 10 October 2011 - 01:33 PM

I cannot believe some of the stuff being said regarding the Lennox case!

The integrity and intentions of some very well respected people are being questioned, not nicely I might add.

Representatives of The Bull Breed Advisory Service and Deed not Breed are being villified by people who know sweet FA!

This campaign has degenerated into one huge slanging match, if only these people could put the same amount of time and effort into the camapign against BSL, it would have been put before parliament and the DDA would have been overhauled by now.

Sorry, rant over.

#11 Rumpole

Rumpole

    Drontal Chick

  • Hosts
  • 4,522 posts

Posted 12 October 2011 - 11:57 AM

Thank you for your support :flowers:

I believe both melp and myself have posted only in order to clarify points on which we have information or experience and we have done so as ourselves and not in the name of our respectful organisations.

We have consistently refused to comment directly on a case in which we have played no part or on the professionals who were involved and who gave evidence on their opinions. opinions however distasteful to some are theirs to have.

I hope we have achieved our aim to be impartial and to not force our own opinions on anyone else and allow them to make up their own minds as that was our only intention. We cannot and will not interfere in a case which has legal representation unless we are directly asked to do so by the legal teams involved.

Threats do not bother me nor do untrue allegations, however what does bother me is how all of this can possibly help anyone.

#12 Ian

Ian
  • Established Member
  • 4,106 posts

Posted 12 October 2011 - 02:28 PM

Comment from Victoria Stilwell, realistically criticising events & calling for change for the future rather than now expecting to save Lennox. I'm sceptical that any Judge would ever accept the word of someoene commenting by video observation alone, however well known they may be, but nevertheless it's an interesting read I thought.

http://positively.co...-failed-lennox/

#13 blackmagic

blackmagic
  • Established Member
  • 3,148 posts

Posted 12 October 2011 - 03:04 PM

!

#14 Melp

Melp

    Exploderous Freak

  • Hosts
  • 14,506 posts

Posted 16 October 2011 - 09:23 PM

DNB and BBAS have consistantly refused to discuss or get drawn into discussions about the case. We weren't involved then, we're not involved now and we won't be involved at any point in the future. Not only has the reputation of DNB been called into question, so has my personal integrity and all for NOT discussig something we were never involved with in the first place. I won't even comment at all on any FB page anymore because of this and am saddened to see people who know me well, criticising me for remaining neutral at best and 'as bad as the people who want him dead' at worst. It's quite disgusting.

#15 EGAR

EGAR

    The Hairy One

  • Banned
  • 3,855 posts

Posted 16 October 2011 - 10:56 PM

DNB and BBAS have consistantly refused to discuss or get drawn into discussions about the case. We weren't involved then, we're not involved now and we won't be involved at any point in the future. Not only has the reputation of DNB been called into question, so has my personal integrity and all for NOT discussig something we were never involved with in the first place. I won't even comment at all on any FB page anymore because of this and am saddened to see people who know me well, criticising me for remaining neutral at best and 'as bad as the people who want him dead' at worst. It's quite disgusting.


The Lennox campaign has become synonymous with slander, libel, threats and keyboard warriors. I have had more than my fair share of all the above.