gremlin22 Posted May 1, 2007 Report Share Posted May 1, 2007 Totally agree, I'm also quite disgusted and upset by some of the remarks made. People are very quick to accuse the press of jumping to conclusions and making assumptions when reporting dog attacks, for instance, but this seems to be exactly what a few people are doing in this case. I can't beleive people are seriously blaming the owner... She may not even have been going round the boot sale, she may just have been dropping off or picking up something..it doesn't even matter..the only ones responsible are the f***wits that torched the car. by this logic, if you kennel your animal outdoors and someone torches it or something else horrendous..it's your own fault? you take your dog for a walk and let if off lead and someone grabs it and kills it..it's your fault??? come off it.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Staffordworld Posted May 1, 2007 Report Share Posted May 1, 2007 Omg this is awful It chokes me up to think about the ppor dogs trapped in there whilst its balze. The owners must be traumertised (sp) There is alot of dog attacks latly. A staffy in Nottingham was out walking with his owner and had bleach thrown in its eyes Why are so people so evil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GSDFan Posted May 1, 2007 Report Share Posted May 1, 2007 I'd like to be able to understand the logic that says this student is a dreadful person ( which he almost certainly is ) : http://www.rykat.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=24919 whilst no blame whatsoever should be apportioned to the person who left her dogs in a car at a car boot sale. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tilly1712 Posted May 1, 2007 Report Share Posted May 1, 2007 I'm just lost for words, this is terrible Poor, poor dogs, how absolutely awful I read this yesterday and just couldn't post anything, I can't stop thinking about it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sanrossscot Posted May 1, 2007 Report Share Posted May 1, 2007 (edited) I'd like to be able to understand the logic that says this student is a dreadful person ( which he almost certainly is ) : http://www.rykat.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=24919 whilst no blame whatsoever should be apportioned to the person who left her dogs in a car at a car boot sale. We have no background into how long the dogs were in the car, what provisons were made etc - the car went/was set on fire. In the other case the student appears to have filled the car with small animals (500) and deliberately left them in hot weather to attend lectures. On the information made available there is a difference wouldn't you say? Edited May 1, 2007 by sanrossscot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ruby1Nic Posted May 2, 2007 Report Share Posted May 2, 2007 We have no background into how long the dogs were in the car, what provisons were made etc - the car went/was set on fire. In the other case the student appears to have filled the car with small animals (500) and deliberately left them in hot weather to attend lectures. On the information made available there is a difference wouldn't you say? I agree entirely. The 2 cases cannot be compared like for like Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts