Rumpole Posted January 18, 2008 Report Share Posted January 18, 2008 http://www.halifaxcourier.co.uk/latest-yor...d-on.3680318.jp http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/humber/7191950.stm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melp Posted January 18, 2008 Report Share Posted January 18, 2008 I don't agree with that. If the driveway gave access to his property only fair enough [and better for us]. Wonder if we can argue that a car isn't a public place? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave the dog Posted January 18, 2008 Report Share Posted January 18, 2008 Good point Melp, the same one I picked up on when I read the item. Talk about a**e about face. A dog bites someone in a shared access, no offence. Registered S1 Dog sits in car with muzzle off and it's seized. Aaargh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rumpole Posted January 18, 2008 Author Report Share Posted January 18, 2008 makes no sense whatsoever and means 1871 is the only recourse in future, and does this repeal the automatic right of access for certain people ie postmen as i would assume the nursing home staff and visitors would have this on a shared driveway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts