kats n greys Posted January 19, 2010 Report Share Posted January 19, 2010 Was a great outcome for all concerned. http://www.animals-in-need.co.uk/ He's been described as type, but he wont be killed- his owners & the rescue centre have also been told that they have no charges to answer - His owners said their main concerns were for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rumpole Posted January 19, 2010 Report Share Posted January 19, 2010 lara and roger represented in this case, glad that rocky has been spared destruction Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kats n greys Posted January 21, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 lara and roger represented in this case, glad that rocky has been spared destruction Wondered who represented them. Glad the judge showed some sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 It's the first time I've seen this & I'm really not sure how to react to that. On the one hand all's well that ends well........... I suppose and yet I can't help thinking that the law is just an ass at times - prosecuting rescues for trying to help dogs, even after they've previously proven responsible? .............. talk about easy targets. They ought to be out targeting / catching the dog fighters & idiots not the rescues & responsible owners but of course that's probably rather harder to do Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts